Study of Heavy metal uptake by Bacillus sp and E. col
PDF (233 KB) Year 2015 Vol 4 Issue 1 Document Type : original article
1handrareddy Vijayadeep 2 Pothukuchi Subrahmanya Sastry 2 3Marigowda Jayaramu 3 1Department of Microbiology, Maharani Lakshmi Ammann i College for Women, Bangalore- 560012. India;
2Department of Botany & Microbiology,Vijaya College, Bangalore- 56001 1, India; 3 D
3Department of Microbiology, Government Science Colle ge, University of Science, Tumkur-572101, India
Abstract Over the past century, unrestricted mining, extens
ive industrialization, modern agricultural practice
s and faulty
waste disposal methods have resulted in the release
of unprecedented levels of toxic heavy metals like
Cd, Hg, Ag, Sn, Pb, Cu, Co,
Mn, Zn, etc into the environment. Many metals are e
ssential for microbial growth in less concentration
, yet are toxic in higher
concentrations. Various methods are available for t
he removal and management of heavy metals: Conventi
onal physico-chemical
methods and emerging biosorption methods. Biosorptio
n is an attractive alternative approach which invol
ves the binding or
adsorption of heavy metals to living or dead cells.
Many microbes have the ability to selectively accu
mulate metals.
Aim:
The
present study was intended to analyze the uptake sy
stems of
Bacillus
and
E. coli
against different concentration of heavy metals
like Zn, Cu, Cd, and Hg in their salt form incorporat
ed into nutrient broth medium observed over a regul
ar interval of time. Analysis was based on how much of the metal from th
e original concentration used was left behind in th
e media
after the rest being up taken by the organism. This
was done using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
(AAS) which was
indirectly the representation of percent uptake of
heavy metal by the respective organism.
Results:
The study showed that Gram –
ve organisms like
E.coli
exhibited more resistance to metals like Zn, Cu and
Hg in relative comparison with Gram +ve organisms
like
Bacillus
.
The study showed that Gram –
ve organisms like
E.coli
exhibited more resistance to metals like Zn, Cu and
Hg in relative comparison with Gram +ve organisms
like
Bacillus
.
Conclusion:
Bacillus
sps was less sensitive to effect of Cd than in
E. coli
KeywordsKeywords:
Bacillus, E. coli
, Bioremediation, Heavy metals, Toxicity, Biosorption
, Uptake capacity, AAS StatisticsArticle View:PDF Download:2572XML Download:967